Philosophical IELTS Questions: A High Schooler’s Challenge, an Adult’s Advantage

The IELTS Speaking test often challenges candidates with philosophical or existential questions, such as those about the nature of happiness, the purpose of life, or the value of art. While adults typically manage to address these questions with relative ease, high school students frequently struggle. This discrepancy raises an important question for educators and teacher trainers: why does this gap exist, and how can we better support younger learners?

This article explores the reasons behind this phenomenon, examines its roots in developmental psychology and education, and offers actionable strategies for teachers to help students build the skills they need to navigate these challenging questions with confidence and depth. To prepare for IELTS with a professional teacher, you can book a class here.

Why High School Students Struggle

1. Cognitive Development and Abstract Thinking

High school students are still developing their capacity for abstract reasoning, which typically matures in late adolescence or early adulthood. According to Piaget’s stages of cognitive development, most teenagers are transitioning into the formal operational stage, where they begin to handle abstract concepts. However, not all high school students reach this stage at the same time, leaving many ill-equipped to tackle philosophical questions.

In contrast, adults have had more time to refine their abstract thinking skills through real-life experiences, higher education, and exposure to complex ideas. As a result, they find it easier to articulate coherent responses to open-ended, thought-provoking questions.

2. Limited Life Experience

Philosophical and existential questions often draw on personal experiences, cultural knowledge, and emotional intelligence. High school students typically lack the breadth of life experiences that inform deeper, more nuanced responses. Without a well of experiences to draw from, they may struggle to provide answers that feel meaningful or authentic.

3. Exposure to Critical Thinking

Many high school curricula prioritize rote learning and standardized testing over critical thinking and philosophical inquiry. As a result, students may not have sufficient practice engaging with abstract or open-ended questions. Adults, on the other hand, are more likely to have encountered these types of questions in university settings, professional development, or personal reflection.

4. Language Proficiency and Vocabulary

For non-native speakers, the ability to articulate complex ideas hinges on a strong command of vocabulary and sentence structure. High school students often lack the linguistic resources needed to express themselves fully, even if they understand the question conceptually. Adults, with more years of language exposure and practice, tend to have a more extensive vocabulary to convey their thoughts effectively.

5. Emotional Confidence and Risk-Taking

Teenagers often feel self-conscious or anxious about expressing opinions, especially in high-stakes testing environments. Adults are generally more confident and willing to take risks, which helps them navigate abstract questions more comfortably.

Why Some Adults Also Struggle

While adults generally find philosophical and abstract questions easier to answer, some still face challenges. This is often due to:

• Lack of Exposure: Adults who have not engaged with higher education or professional fields requiring abstract thinking may lack practice in addressing such questions. For instance, they might struggle with queries like, “What is art?” or “What does it mean to live a meaningful life?”
• Over-Reliance on Practical Thinking: Many adults’ day-to-day lives revolve around practical and concrete problem-solving rather than abstract reasoning. This can lead to difficulty when asked to reflect deeply on intangible concepts.
• Cultural or Educational Backgrounds: Adults from education systems or cultures that prioritize rote learning over critical thinking may also find philosophical questions daunting. For example, someone unfamiliar with discussing art might offer a simplistic answer like, “Art is painting,” rather than exploring its deeper societal or emotional impacts.

How High Schoolers’ Brain Plasticity Offsets Their Challenges

Although high school students often struggle with philosophical and existential questions due to limited life experience and cognitive development, their brain plasticity and openness to new experiences give them a unique advantage. Adolescents’ brains are highly adaptable, allowing them to absorb new concepts and develop critical thinking skills more rapidly than adults in many cases.

This mental plasticity enables students to adapt to abstract reasoning when given proper guidance and practice. For example, a teenager exposed to discussions about “What is art?” for the first time might initially offer simplistic answers. However, with structured support, they can quickly expand their understanding, incorporating ideas about art’s emotional and cultural significance. Similarly, their openness to new perspectives can lead to creative and original responses that adults might overlook due to entrenched ways of thinking.

Teachers and trainers can harness this adaptability by providing stimulating and supportive learning environments that encourage exploration, experimentation, and reflection. Activities like debates, role-plays, and exposure to diverse ideas are especially effective in leveraging students’ openness and mental flexibility.

What Can Teachers Do About It?

1. Incorporate Abstract Questions into Classroom Practice

To prepare students for the philosophical questions they might encounter, teachers should introduce similar prompts during speaking practice. Examples include:

• “What is the role of happiness in a successful life?”
• “How can art influence society?”
• “Do you think technology has improved human connections?”

Regular exposure to such questions will help students build familiarity and confidence. Teachers should guide students to think critically and provide structured frameworks for developing coherent answers, such as the PEEL method (Point, Evidence, Explanation, Link).

2. Teach Critical Thinking Skills

Embedding critical thinking exercises into lessons can help students approach abstract questions more effectively. Activities such as debates, role plays, and ethical dilemmas encourage students to think deeply, evaluate multiple perspectives, and develop logical arguments. For example:

• Ask students to debate the pros and cons of a philosophical statement like, “Happiness is more important than success.”
• Use group activities where students must solve moral dilemmas, such as deciding the best use of limited resources in a fictional scenario.

3. Build Vocabulary for Abstract Topics

Teachers should introduce and practice vocabulary related to common abstract themes like happiness, ethics, technology, and art. Word maps, sentence stems, and paraphrasing exercises can help students expand their linguistic repertoire. For instance:

• Teach synonyms and antonyms for emotions (“joyful” vs. “sorrowful”).
• Provide sentence stems like, “I believe that happiness is… because…”

4. Leverage Case Studies and Real-Life Examples

High school students may struggle to draw from personal experiences, but teachers can bridge this gap by introducing case studies and relatable examples. For instance:

• Discuss real-life stories of individuals who overcame challenges to find happiness or success.
• Use famous artworks or technological innovations to spark discussions about their societal impact.

5. Reduce Performance Anxiety

To build students’ confidence, create a safe and supportive environment for practicing philosophical questions. Techniques such as peer feedback, group discussions, and mock interviews can help students feel more comfortable. Additionally, teachers can emphasize that there are no “right” answers to these questions—only thoughtful ones.

Practical Suggestions and Activities

Activity 1: Role-Playing Interviews

Have students pair up and role-play as interviewer and interviewee. The interviewer asks philosophical IELTS-style questions, while the interviewee practices answering. Rotate roles and provide feedback.

Activity 2: Think-Pair-Share

Pose an abstract question to the class, such as “What makes life meaningful?” Students think individually, discuss their ideas with a partner, and then share with the group. This process helps them refine their thoughts and gain confidence.

Activity 3: Brainstorming Sessions

Choose a topic like “The value of art in modern society.” As a class, brainstorm possible angles, examples, and vocabulary. Then have students craft individual responses.

Case Study: A Successful Classroom Strategy

In a controlled study conducted by a group of IELTS instructors in Hanoi, Vietnam, teachers integrated philosophical questions into weekly speaking practice sessions. Over a semester, 50 high school students participated in these sessions, which included structured frameworks for answering abstract questions, vocabulary-building exercises, and group discussions.

At the beginning of the study, only 30% of students reported feeling confident answering abstract questions. By the end of the program, 80% expressed improved confidence, and their IELTS speaking scores increased by an average of 1.5 bands. For instance, one student, Mai Linh, initially struggled with questions like, “What does art mean to you?” but later impressed examiners with her response, “Art is a reflection of human emotion and creativity. It helps us communicate ideas that words cannot fully express.”

This approach not only improved test scores but also equipped students with critical thinking and articulation skills that would benefit them in future academic and professional settings.

Conclusion

The difficulty high school students face with philosophical questions in IELTS speaking tests stems from developmental, experiential, and educational factors. By understanding these challenges and implementing targeted strategies, teachers can equip students with the tools they need to succeed. Through practice, critical thinking, and vocabulary building, young learners can gain the confidence and skills required to tackle even the most abstract questions with ease.